We’ve recently replaced Rapid PREreviews with Structured PREreviews.
You can write a Structured PREreview now.
We’ll be updating older Rapid PREreviews like these soon.
| Question | Yes | Unsure | N/A | No |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Are the findings novel? | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Are the results likely to lead to future research? | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Is sufficient detail provided to allow reproduction of the study? | 0% | 29% | 0% | 71% |
| Are the methods and statistics appropriate for the analysis? | 29% | 29% | 0% | 43% |
| Are the principal conclusions supported by the data and analysis? | 43% | 0% | 0% | 57% |
| Does the manuscript discuss limitations? | 14% | 0% | 0% | 86% |
| Have the authors adequately discussed ethical concerns? | 57% | 43% | 0% | 0% |
| Does the manuscript include new data? | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Are the data used in the manuscript available? | 0% | 14% | 0% | 86% |
| Is the code used in the manuscript available? | 29% | 0% | 57% | 14% |
| Would you recommend this manuscript to others? | 86% | 0% | 0% | 14% |
| Do you recommend this manuscript for peer review? | 71% | 0% | 0% | 29% |
The following PREreview results from a live-streamed discussion which took place on September 22, 2020 between Jonny Coates, Karen Eddleman, Monica Granados, Emily Lescak, Phrasia Mapfumo, Mafalda Pimentel, and Daniela Saderi.
General preprint assessment
…